Please check Agree or Disagree: Do you agree to the following terms?
“I pledge to keep my weight under control by maintaining a BMI less than 30. If my BMI is currently above 30, I agree to participate in a weight loss program.”
What if a candidate could be removed from consideration for a job by refusing to check “agree” to this question on an application? Or, what if breaking this agreement was grounds for increased health care premiums or higher deductibles?
Is this a crazy proposal? Is it smart? Forward-thinking?
Some companies already have health pledges, similar to the one above, requiring employees to agree to abstain from smoking. Before a potential employee submits an application, he or she is required to check a little white box, signifying his or her agreement to not use tobacco products.
So, requiring prospective employees to agree to keep their weight under control isn’t such a far-fetched idea. Cancer is the No. 2 killer in America, behind heart disease, which sits at No. 1. You prevent certain types of cancer by not smoking; you prevent heart disease, in many cases, by maintaining a healthy weight.
When you put the facts in perspective, suddenly the proposal doesn’t seem quite so crazy.
The most recent company to take a stand toward health is CVS. The company announced all employees who receive health insurance must report their weight, body fat, and glucose levels to the insurer. If employees refuse, they have to pay a $600 penalty. It’s not necessarily a health pledge, but it’s a step in that direction.
Clearly you can’t and shouldn’t discriminate against a potential employee because he or she is overweight, but you can promote a healthy workplace by having an overweight or obese employee pledge to complete a weight loss program. By requiring overweight employees to complete a program with proven results like The Center for Medical Weight Loss, you will see a significant difference in employee productivity and satisfaction and a decrease in overall healthcare costs over time.
If employees are willing to sign a health pledge and stick to it, they should be rewarded with lower premiums. If there is no incentive, you risk losing motivation. This can go a long way in ensuring both healthy habits and preventative care.
Encouraging employees to improve their health can be a positive initiative. If the payer of healthcare costs has knowledge of who is engaging in behavior that could drive costs up for everyone, he or she can begin to figure out how the costs could be reflective of individual healthy living profiles. The key will be to know where to stop, so genetic or pre-existing conditions do not cause penalties or higher premiums to be enacted.
Each company is different. In order to determine whether requiring a health pledge is beneficial for your company, you need to evaluate employee population and company culture.
What do you think? Is a health pledge a good or bad idea?
